John Swinney decries ‘severe danger’ after Sunday’s quarter-final
- "baseUrl": "./src",
据雷递报道，立讯精密日前向港交所递交招股书，计划在今年于香港上市，形成「A+H」股架构。这家总部位于深圳的精密智造企业已在 A 股上市，当前市值约 3651 亿元。。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
Мощный удар Израиля по Ирану попал на видео09:41，详情可参考新收录的资料
FT Videos & Podcasts，详情可参考新收录的资料
Now back to reality, LLMs are never that good, they're never near that hypothetical "I'm feeling lucky", and this has to do with how they're fundamentally designed, I never so far asked GPT about something that I'm specialized at, and it gave me a sufficient answer that I would expect from someone who is as much as expert as me in that given field. People tend to think that GPT (and other LLMs) is doing so well, but only when it comes to things that they themselves do not understand that well (Gell-Mann Amnesia2), even when it sounds confident, it may be approximating, averaging, exaggerate (Peters 2025) or confidently (Sun 2025) reproducing a mistake. There is no guarantee whatsoever that the answer it gives is the best one, the contested one, or even a correct one, only that it is a plausible one. And that distinction matters, because intellect isn’t built on plausibility but on understanding why something might be wrong, who disagrees with it, what assumptions are being smuggled in, and what breaks when those assumptions fail